Subject: Re: [xsl] text replacement with mixed content From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:21:14 +0100 |
On 31 August 2011 13:09, Geert Bormans <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > At 13:30 31/08/2011, you wrote: >> >> > <x> >> > <p>my foo, zzz, my <bold>foo</bold>, zzz</p> >> > <p>zzz my f-oo zzz m-y foo zzz</p> >> > <p>zzz my foo zzz my <j>foo my foo</j> zzz</p> >> > <p>zzz my<b> fjjj</b></p> >> > <p>zzzzz<b>my </b><x> </x><b>foo zzz</b></p> >> > </x> >> >> ..but what's the required output? > > Hi Andrew, sorry, I was on the phone for a while... > > I hope I didn't make any mistakes :-) > here is what I need > > <x> > <p><rep>your bar</rep>, zzz, <rep>your bar</rep>, zzz</p> > <p>zzz <rep>your bar</rep> zzz <rep>your bar</rep> zzz</p> > <p>zzz <rep>your bar</rep> zzz <rep>your bar</rep><rep>your bar</rep> > zzz</p> > <p>zzz my<b> fjjj</b></p> > <p>zzzzz<b><rep>your bar</rep> zzz</b></p> > </x> Ok I've not totally convinced by that expected output, if you are dropping that level of markup (such as the <j>) then you are heading towards just stripping all the markup... If possible do some actual real world example, with solid expected results. When the task is "non-trivial" like this one, you really don't want mistakes in the expected results. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] text replacement with mix, Geert Bormans | Thread | Re: [xsl] text replacement with mix, Geert Bormans |
Re: [xsl] text replacement with mix, Geert Bormans | Date | Re: [xsl] text replacement with mix, Geert Bormans |
Month |