Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath that returns nothing From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:58:39 +0100 (BST) |
Liam R E Quin wrote: Hi, > Hmm, depending on the evaluation context, /*[false()] is safer That's the exact same idea than the simpler /.. AFAIK. > e.g. since this is the XSL list, you may not have a context > item. But if you don't have a context item, what's the value of / ? Regards, -- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/ http://h2oconsulting.be/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XPath that returns nothin, Liam R E Quin | Thread | Re: [xsl] XPath that returns nothin, Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] XML pretty printer, John Christopher | Date | [xsl] RE: XSL-FL Basic-link results, Sharon Harris |
Month |