Subject: Re: [xsl] () eq () vs () = () From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:26:18 -0400 |
Regarding deep-equal(), the first bullet seems wrong: "If the two sequences are both empty, the function returns true." It's well defined, but doesn't seem to follow the rest of the spec where one side is (). I wonder if it could easily be as well defined as 'false'.
So, changing that to false, making the comparison operators return false instead of (), and xs:boolean behave like fn:boolean... not too late is it? :)
-- Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] () eq () vs () = (), Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] () eq () vs () = (), Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] () eq () vs () = (), Andrew Welch | Date | Re: [xsl] () eq () vs () = (), Michael Kay |
Month |