RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Schematron Decision: Sanity Check

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Schematron Decision: Sanity Check

Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Schematron Decision: Sanity Check
From: Norm Birkett <Norm.Birkett@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:06:23 -0400

Eliot Kimber [mailto:ekimber@xxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> I would tend to lean toward Schematron on the principle of separation
> of
> concerns, where the ownership of the rules for the data validation is
> likely
> different from the implementation of the transformation rules.

A very useful point. Thanks, Eliot--and for your comments about .NET.

Norm

Current Thread
[xsl] XSLT vs Schematron Decision: Sanity Check Norm Birkett - 12 Oct 2011 17:27:00 -0000 Eliot Kimber - 12 Oct 2011 18:36:15 -0000 Norm Birkett - 13 Oct 2011 20:06:46 -0000 <= Wendell Piez - 19 Oct 2011 16:26:18 -0000 Philip Fearon - 21 Oct 2011 08:53:25 -0000 Norm Birkett - 21 Oct 2011 16:35:14 -0000 Wendell Piez - 21 Oct 2011 16:46:08 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Schematron Decisi, Eliot Kimber	Thread	Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Schematron Decisi, Wendell Piez
RE: [xsl] Status of schematron mail, Norm Birkett	Date	[xsl] tokenize, Peter Flynn
	Month