Subject: Re: [xsl] Position() Function Using Filter From: Vasu Chakkera <vasucv@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 05:07:21 -0700 |
>I am working with > xslt 1.0 Why?? (just out of interest..) On 28 October 2011 15:34, Lighton Phiri <lighton.phiri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks all the the valuable feedback. The count approach suggested by > Andrew& Brandon did the trick :) --count(preceding-sibling::*) > Awesome! > > just so you know, I forgot an important detail --I am working with > xslt 1.0 and so "index-of and " and the book[tokenize(., '/')[last()] > eq $bpage] hint wont work. > > Lighton Phiri > http://lightonphiri.org/ > @lightonphiri > > > > > On 28 October 2011 21:01, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex > <gerrit.imsieke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> On 2011-10-28 20:17, Liam R E Quin wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 10:27 -0400, Murray McDonald wrote: >>>> >>>> If you are sure that there will be one and only one "match" then the >>>> '[1]' >>>> is unnecessary >>>> >>>> index-of(//book, //book[ends-with(., 'ASTRO_00007.JPG')])[1] >>> >>> On the other hand, the difference between /a/b/c[1] and (/a/b/c)[1] is a >>> major source of confusion for the newcomer and the "perpetual >>> intermediate" [1] alike. >> >> Thanks for confusing the perpetual intermediate with a [1] that looks like a >> positional predicate but that actually is a citation link. Pun intended? >> >>> >>> Sometimes you have to make the computer work a little harder if it means >>> getting the right answer more often. >> >> Agree [+1]. > > -- Vasu Chakkera NodeLogic Limited Oxford www.node-logic.com ==============
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Position() Function Using, Lighton Phiri | Thread | Re: [xsl] Position() Function Using, Lighton Phiri |
Re: [xsl] Position() Function Using, Lighton Phiri | Date | Re: [xsl] Position() Function Using, Lighton Phiri |
Month |