Subject: Re: [xsl] Getting text from string From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 19:10:51 +0530 |
Of-course you're response was not redundant :) It depicted a particular view point and someone might have learnt from it (infact I also did, since your mail forced me to think otherwise). I best practice may be to read earlier replies to a thread, and respond taking contextual information from someone else's reply within the thread. But this can sometimes be missed (I may also experience this sometime), when there are many people participating in a thread. On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Mandar Jagtap <mandar.jagtap@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Actually, I didn't see Andrew's & Michael's response on original message (those messages got moved to particular folder in mailbox). My fault! SorryB about redundant response! > > Mandar Jagtap -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Getting text from string, Mandar Jagtap | Thread | Re: [xsl] Getting text from string, Stefan Krause |
Re: [xsl] Getting text from string, Mandar Jagtap | Date | [xsl] [possibly off topic] Adoption, Hank Ratzesberger |
Month |