Subject: Re: [xsl] result-document output method vs unnammed output method From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 17:07:14 +0000 |
> Well, I've already made one big mistake today ... I'll risk another. I'll > say: > > <foo>bar</foo> > > The imported method would have changed the main output to text except that > the result-document instruction overrides that. > > Why do you ask? ...because I thought the same as you :) -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] result-document output me, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: [xsl] result-document output me, G. Ken Holman |
Re: [xsl] result-document output me, G. Ken Holman | Date | Re: [xsl] result-document output me, G. Ken Holman |
Month |