Subject: Re: [xsl] Rule of thumb: Are XPath 2.0 or XSLT 2.0 constructs faster? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:37:58 +0000 |
Do XSLT constructs maybe have an overhead that XPath ones don't?
Michael KnowsTheseThings, but I'll hazard an answer anyway. if you look at Xquery syntax which is basically just an xpath-like syntax for parts of XSLT, and the fact that saxon (at least) compiles xquery and xslt (and xpath) down to the same internal representation, I would expect that there is negligible difference in compilation time and literally no difference in run time behaviour when the xpath and xslt are really doing the same thing.
________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Rule of thumb: Are XPath 2.0 , TW | Thread | Re: [xsl] Rule of thumb: Are XPath , Michael Kay |
[xsl] Comparing numbers with differ, Clint Redwood | Date | Re: [xsl] Comparing numbers with di, David Carlisle |
Month |