Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors From: Liam R E Quin <liam@xxxxxx> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:54:53 +0100 |
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 12:34 +0000, Michael Kay wrote: > [...] > Perhaps Steve Ball > > found something else to do with his weekends. I think the days of > > hobbyist implementations of these technologies are past. > This posting sort of sums it up: > > http://mail.explain.com.au/pipermail/libx/2011-September/000004.html Large open source projects generally need a community, or someone with a lot of wisdom and generosity and dedication and focus, or (best) both. I agree 100%. On the other hand, a C (not C++) implementation would bring XSLT 2 a lot closer to PHP, Python, Perl, JavaScript, etc. Or maybe even a translation into XQuery, hmmm... Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] Rule of thumb: Are XPath , Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, Wendell Piez |
Month |