Re: [xsl] overlap nomenclature

Subject: Re: [xsl] overlap nomenclature
From: Syd Bauman <Syd_Bauman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:31:29 -0500
> ... but is there any real issue with what I was saying, aside from
> the terminological mistake (and I was a lawyer in my previous life,
> so I do not take terminology lightly)?

No, not at all. (At least, I don't think so.)


But if there's more to this, let's take it off-list, as it's not
really XSL-related.

Current Thread