Subject: [xsl] Unravelling Imports From: ihe onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:36:28 +0100 |
There is a supposed requirement that we deliver monolithic XSLT with includes unravelled (there are no imports). I don't need to be convinced it's a bad and misguided idea but I won't close off anyone who wants to comment as they may think of stuff that I haven't. The purpose of my post though is this. Suppose we did go ahead and code with imports, would it be possible to define a transform that mechanically transformed everything into monolithic XML. I'm thinking it would involve alot of use of priorities at the very least. Ihe
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Calling a template before, Peter Desjardins | Thread | Re: [xsl] Unravelling Imports, G. Ken Holman |
Re: [xsl] xslt-events and questions, Hermann Stamm-Wilbra | Date | RE: [xsl] Unravelling Imports, Scott Trenda |
Month |