| Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath shorthand From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:42:02 -0700 | 
Assuming you are using XPath 2.0:
    following-sibling::*[matches(name(), '^[A-Z]$')]
Cheers,
Dimitre.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> what is shorthand for "folllowing-sibling::A | following-sibling::B
> .........following-sibling::Z"
>
> Anything better than  "following-sibling::*[self::A||self::B...|self::C]  ?
>
-- 
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
biggest mistake of all
------------------------------------
Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
-------------------------------------
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
-------------------------------------
I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.
| Current Thread | 
|---|
| 
 | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] XPath shorthand, Andrew Welch | Thread | [xsl] Pattern Matching in XSl - fin, Kerry, Richard | 
| Re: [xsl] XPath shorthand, Andrew Welch | Date | RE: [xsl] Pattern Matching in XSl -, G. Ken Holman | 
| Month |