Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath 1.0: sum() and precision From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 23:09:30 +0100 (BST) |
Andrew Welch wrote: Hi, > I guess if you are stuck with xpath 1.0 it would have to be > substring... (or split on the ., then round() on the first 3 digits > eg the 490) Thanks Andrew. That's what I thought too, but I wanted to avoid string functions for that purpose. What I've done in the meantime is replacing sum(...) by: round(sum(...) * 100) div 100 that is, "moving the dot right", rounding as an integer, then "moving the dot left" again. Regards, -- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/ http://h2oconsulting.be/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XPath 1.0: sum() and prec, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] XPath 1.0: sum() and prec, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] fo:multi-switch or altern, G. Ken Holman | Date | Re: [xsl] XPath 1.0: sum() and prec, David Carlisle |
Month |