Subject: Re: [xsl] fo:multi-switch or alternative From: Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 08:15:35 +0200 |
Kevin Brown wrote: > Question: Can the table + content be in its own page-sequence? > If the answer is yes, I do not see why you could not use ... ... > Or, if preferred without "only" which I forget may also be a 1.1 concept: ... Sounds interesting but I would need more help. If you have the time, please modify Ken's solution so it not only works with XSL-FO 1.1 but also with XSL-FO 1.0. Cheers Jesper Tverskov http://www.xmlplease.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] fo:multi-switch or altern, Kevin Brown | Thread | Re: [xsl] fo:multi-switch or altern, G. Ken Holman |
Re: [xsl][xslt v1.0] How to parse t, Mak Praveen | Date | [xsl] getting all values from a map, Jakub Malý |
Month |