Subject: Re: [xsl] Saxon-EE 9.4.0.6 can't adress comment nodes From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:12:37 +0100 |
OK, many thanks. It looks as if filtering out comments from the tree view that is seen by assertions is having the unintended side-effect of filtering them out from the validation output. We'll look into it. Michael Kay Saxonica On 10 Apr 2013, at 14:57, Octavian Nadolu wrote: > Hello, > > The problem can be reproduced in oXygen 14.2 if schema-based validation (-val) is enabled, the XML Schema version is set to 1.1 (-xsdversion) and the 'assertions can see comments' option is disabled. > To resolve the problem you can enable the 'assertions can see comments' option from the oXygen preferences, 'XML / XML Parser / XML Schema' options page or you can set the default XML Schema version to 1.0, from the same options page. > > This behavior can be reproduced also by running the transformation with Saxon from the command line, with the following parameters: > java -jar saxon9ee.jar test.xml -xsl:test.xsl -config:saxonCfg.xml > > ------- saxonCfg.xml-------------- > <configuration edition="EE" xmlns="http://saxon.sf.net/ns/configuration"> > <xsd version="1.1" assertionsCanSeeComments="false"/> > <global schemaValidation="lax"/> > <xslt schemaAware="true"> > <extensionElement/> > </xslt> > </configuration> > ------------------------------------------- > > Regards, > Octavian > --------------- > Octavian Nadolu > <oXygen/> XML Editor > http://www.oxygenxml.com > > On 10.04.2013 14:42, Michael Kay wrote: >> We've tried this out on oXygen 14.2 and we're unable to reproduce the problem. >> >> We can try it again perhaps with a specific stylesheet, source document, and schema. >> >> Michael Kay >> Saxonica >> >> >> On 10 Apr 2013, at 09:15, bjoern.duenckel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >>>> I'm always a bit reticent about discussing product-specific issues on = >>>> this list - I like to be helpful to users and I don't mind doing it in = >>>> public, but I'm conscious that not everyone on the list is interested. = >>>> There's a Saxon specific forum athttp://saxonica.plan.io which you are = >>>> welcome to use. >>> Thanks for the advice! >>> I will use the forum for Saxon realted issues in the future. >>> >>>> I can't see any obvious reason for this behaviour. Schema validation per = >>>> se shouldn't lose the comments, although it ignores them. How are you = >>>> invoking the transformation? >>> I used an oXygen transformation scenario to invoke the transformation: >>> >>> oXygen XML Editor 14.2, build 2013030817 >>> Transformer: Saxon-EE 9.4.0.6 >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Bjvrn D|nckel.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Saxon-EE 9.4.0.6 can't ad, Octavian Nadolu | Thread | Re: [xsl] Saxon-EE 9.4.0.6 can't ad, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Saxon-EE 9.4.0.6 can't ad, Octavian Nadolu | Date | Re: [xsl] Saxon-EE 9.4.0.6 can't ad, Michael Kay |
Month |