Re: [xsl] XTTE1100: A sequence of more than one item is not allowed as the @group-adjacent attribute

Subject: Re: [xsl] XTTE1100: A sequence of more than one item is not allowed as the @group-adjacent attribute
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 20:56:22 -0700
Yes, this should work:

    group-adjacent="*/serialize(.)"

On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It seems to me that something like this might be useful:
>
> group-adjacent="my:deepEqualAdjacent(*)"
>
>
> of course this only conveys the idea -- it is obvious that this isn't precise.
>
>
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 8:08 PM, G. Ken Holman
> <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> At 2013-05-12 20:00 -0700, Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
>>>
>>>      select="*" group-adjacent="string-join(descendent::*/local-name(),'
>>> ')"
>>>
>>> this treats the following two fragments as belonging to the same
>>> group, and I believe Ihe doesn't want this:
>>>
>>>  <B>
>>>      <C/>
>>>      <D/>
>>>   </B>
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>>  <B>
>>>      <C>
>>>        <D>
>>>     </C>
>>>   </B>
>>
>>
>> Well spotted, Dmitre.
>>
>> How about something like the following to make the distinction, using a
>> simple non-name character to attach the depth to the name?
>>
>>   group-adjacent="string-join(descendent::*/
>>                              concat(local-name(),'$',count(ancestor::*)))"
>>
>> (untested)
>>
>>
>> . . . . . . . . Ken
>>
>> --
>> Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training |
>> Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm |
>> Crane Softwrights Ltd.            http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ |
>> G. Ken Holman                   mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
>> Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about |
>> Legal business disclaimers:    http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal |
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Dimitre Novatchev
> ---------------------------------------
> Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
> ---------------------------------------
> To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
> -------------------------------------
> Never fight an inanimate object
> -------------------------------------
> To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
> biggest mistake of all
> ------------------------------------
> Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
> -------------------------------------
> You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
> you're doing is work or play
> -------------------------------------
> Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
> -------------------------------------
> Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they
> write all patents, too? :)
> -------------------------------------
> I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.



-- 
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
biggest mistake of all
------------------------------------
Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
-------------------------------------
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
-------------------------------------
Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they
write all patents, too? :)
-------------------------------------
I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.

Current Thread