Re: [xsl] Equal rights for xsl:next-match & co

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] Equal rights for xsl:next-match & co

Subject: Re: [xsl] Equal rights for xsl:next-match & co
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 09:51:06 +0100

On 17/05/2013 20:29, Evan Lenz wrote:

What bugs me is that you can't call <xsl:next-match/> inside
<xsl:for-each> (because the "current template rule" is considered to
be nullified).

I'm sure something could be defined but the semantics of that would be a
little odd (whichever way it was defined) as next-match would need to
trigger a template matching the node that matched the current template
but that would not (usually) be the current node within a for-each.

David

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Equal rights for xsl:next-match & co, (continued) Ihe Onwuka - 17 May 2013 18:44:29 -0000 Evan Lenz - 17 May 2013 19:29:24 -0000 Ihe Onwuka - 17 May 2013 19:33:07 -0000 Liam R E Quin - 18 May 2013 05:38:27 -0000 David Carlisle - 18 May 2013 08:51:23 -0000 <= Evan Lenz - 21 May 2013 16:15:43 -0000 David Carlisle - 21 May 2013 16:25:17 -0000 Evan Lenz - 21 May 2013 18:32:36 -0000 Wendell Piez - 27 May 2013 22:29:51 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] Equal rights for xsl:next-match & co, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Equal rights for xsl:next, Liam R E Quin	Thread	Re: [xsl] Equal rights for xsl:next, Evan Lenz
Re: [xsl] Equal rights for xsl:next, Liam R E Quin	Date	Re: [xsl] Equal rights for xsl:next, David Carlisle
	Month