Subject: Re: [xsl] deep copy without attributes From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 09:09:15 +0100 |
> I've not been paying attention to 3.0 but I'd be looking at copy-of > and thinking it is ripe for accepting an anonymous function/template > that is applied as it traverses it's hierarchy. which would be another > way of addressing the issue. ...but that's already inbuilt into the language - template matching. That's 'the xslt way' of solving this problem. A deep copy (xsl:copy-of) copies the entire subtree unmodified, so that would be the wrong approach if you want the output tree to be different to the input tree... but I agree that the identity template and shallow copying etc takes a bit of understanding. But when the penny does drop, the genius of it all becomes clear. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] deep copy without attribu, davep | Thread | Re: [xsl] deep copy without attribu, Graydon |
Re: [xsl] deep copy without attribu, davep | Date | Re: [xsl] deep copy without attribu, Graydon |
Month |