Subject: Re: [xsl] A nice way to implement the ANDing of the comparison of pairs of items in a sequence?|
From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 21:40:50 -0400
Glad to see this issue at hand reolved so elegantly but if I might clarify one digressional point:
DeMorgan's Law: is not "AND" is the same as "not( OR )" but rather "AND" is the same as "not( NOR )"
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 4:24 PM, G. Ken Holman <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think Michael wins this one! > > > . . . . . . Ken > > At 2013-09-05 21:06 +0100, Michael Kay wrote: >> >> How about >> >> deep-equal($v[position() mod 2 = 0], $v[position() mod 2 = 1]) >> >> Michael Kay >> Saxonica >
-- Public XSLT, XSL-FO, and UBL classes in the Netherlands Oct 2013 | Public XSLT, XSL-FO, UBL and code list classes in Australia Oct 2013 | Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training | Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm | Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ | G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about | Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal |