Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?

Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?
From: davep <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 08:01:57 +0000
On 02/11/13 07:23, Toshihiko Makita wrote:
Dear Quin

 > The answer is probably for people to invest in CSS, not XSL-FO, these
 > XSLT development is active and continuing.
 > XSL-FO development is less active.

Here are several questions.

1. Did W3C determine to discontinue developing XSL-FO 2.0 for the feature?

Insufficient support from W3C members.

2. What is the main cause that XSL-FO 2.0
( has been failed?

I don't think it did 'fail'.

3. I beleive that XSL-FO is most suitable techinology for formatting XML
documents. Does CSS techinology become the complete alternative of the

Not yet is the honest answer. Watch the CSS space for developments,
or join W3C and help development in that direction. There's a long way to go.


Dave Pawson

Current Thread