Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?|
From: davep <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 08:01:57 +0000
> The answer is probably for people to invest in CSS, not XSL-FO, these days. > XSLT development is active and continuing. > XSL-FO development is less active.
Here are several questions.
1. Did W3C determine to discontinue developing XSL-FO 2.0 for the feature?
2. What is the main cause that XSL-FO 2.0 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-xslfo20-20120117/) has been failed?
3. I beleive that XSL-FO is most suitable techinology for formatting XML documents. Does CSS techinology become the complete alternative of the XSL-FO?
-- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk