Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?

On 02/11/13 07:23, Toshihiko Makita wrote:
[...]

3. I beleive that XSL-FO is most suitable techinology for formatting XML
documents. Does CSS techinology become the complete alternative of the
XSL-FO?

Bear in mind that you can also produce PDF by using XSLT[2] to generate LaTeX. I know this is heresy to many people here, but it provides a useful path to PDF that is unencumbered, and allows re-use of the significant body of knowledge of documents and their formatting requirements that is a part of the LaTeX ecosystem.

///Peter

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?, (continued) Liam R E Quin - 2 Nov 2013 08:49:07 -0000 G. Ken Holman - 3 Nov 2013 16:41:52 -0000 Tony Graham - 4 Nov 2013 15:27:25 -0000 Peter West - 4 Nov 2013 22:27:42 -0000 Peter Flynn - 5 Nov 2013 14:06:18 -0000 <= Kevin Brown - 2 Nov 2013 07:42:25 -0000 Toshihiko Makita - 2 Nov 2013 15:42:08 -0000 Liam R E Quin - 2 Nov 2013 20:18:25 -0000 Toshihiko Makita - 4 Nov 2013 10:23:54 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?, (continued)
- Kevin Brown - 2 Nov 2013 07:42:25 -0000
- Toshihiko Makita - 2 Nov 2013 15:42:08 -0000
  - Liam R E Quin - 2 Nov 2013 20:18:25 -0000
- Toshihiko Makita - 4 Nov 2013 10:23:54 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?, Peter West	Thread	Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?, Kevin Brown
Re: [xsl] [xsl] xsl 2.0?, Wayne Brissette	Date	Re: [xsl] Data science, data analyt, Wendell Piez
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home