Subject: Re: [xsl] Streaming best practice: no user-defined functions with node parameters ... Do you agree? From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:58:32 +0000 |
On 15 Nov 2013, at 14:30, Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But does it mean we won't be able (when > streaming) to call functions even with temporary trees or snapshots? In the current draft (which we're working hard to get the final bugs out of...) we've re-introduced a kind of data-flow analysis that enables us to distinguish statically whether the node being passed to a function is a streamed node or not. There's no problem with passing "ordinary" nodes to a function (or template) parameter, it's only streamed nodes that are problematic. Michael Kay Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Streaming best practice: , Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] Streaming best practice: , Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] Streaming best practice: , Wendell Piez | Date | Re: [xsl] Streaming best practice: , Wendell Piez |
Month |