Subject: [xsl] '"as" SequenceType' vs 'TypeDeclaration' in XPath 3.0? From: "Tony Graham" <tgraham@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:08:46 -0000 (GMT) |
In XPath 3.0 [1], what tips the balance between the occurrence of '"as" SequenceType' in production [64] versus the occurrence of 'TypeDeclaration' in production [3], where 'TypeDeclaration' is defined as '"as" SequenceType' in production [66]? [64] InlineFunctionExpr ::= "function" "(" ParamList? ")" ("as" SequenceType)? FunctionBody [2] ParamList ::= Param ("," Param)* [3] Param ::= "$" EQName TypeDeclaration? [66] TypeDeclaration ::= "as" SequenceType Regards, Tony Graham tgraham@xxxxxxxxxx Consultant http://www.mentea.net Mentea 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- XML, XSL-FO and XSLT consulting, training and programming Chair, Print and Page Layout Community Group @ W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-30/ [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-30/#prod-xpath30-Param [64] http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-30/#prod-xpath30-InlineFunctionExpr [66] http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-30/#prod-xpath30-TypeDeclaration
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] XSL-List Guidelines, Tommie Usdin | Thread | Re: [xsl] '"as" SequenceType' vs 'T, Michael Kay |
[xsl] XSL-List Guidelines, Tommie Usdin | Date | Re: [xsl] '"as" SequenceType' vs 'T, Michael Kay |
Month |