Subject: Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree? From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 21:11:21 +0000 |
> It's traversing the subtree rooted at $n that's not an inspection > operation; this requires access to the nodes under $n, so it would be > an absorption operation. So from context $n, count($n/some/path) is > not going to be streamable unless we allow it to "absorb" $n in doing > so -- not because of the count(), but because of the traversal. My reading of it so far suggests that count($n/some/path) would be "striding" and therefore streamable. It would only be "absorbing" if you materialised the contents of <path>. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Wendell Piez | Date | Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |