Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?
From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:42:21 +0000
> Does the spec need a term to indicate this relation in the general
> case? I agree that the term "overlap" is fraught with other senses,
> and should probably be avoided.
> 

I have raised this terminological issue here:

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24290

and we'll see what we can come up with.

Michael Kay
Saxonica

Current Thread