RE: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the wh

Subject: RE: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?
From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 21:20:58 +0000

I vote for "nested".

Sample usage:

	//x is a "crawling" expression - one that selects
	nodes which may nest inside one another.

/Roger

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, (continued) davep - 15 Jan 2014 09:44:57 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 15 Jan 2014 15:12:54 -0000 Wendell Piez - 15 Jan 2014 15:56:37 -0000 Michael Sokolov - 15 Jan 2014 20:18:09 -0000 Costello, Roger L. - 14 Jan 2014 21:21:11 -0000 <= Piotr Bański - 14 Jan 2014 21:49:37 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 14 Jan 2014 22:08:56 -0000 Piotr Bański - 14 Jan 2014 22:23:59 -0000 Costello, Roger L. - 15 Jan 2014 10:48:44 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, (continued)
- Costello, Roger L. - 14 Jan 2014 21:21:11 -0000 <=
  - Piotr Bański - 14 Jan 2014 21:49:37 -0000
    - Dimitre Novatchev - 14 Jan 2014 22:08:56 -0000
    - Piotr Bański - 14 Jan 2014 22:23:59 -0000
- Costello, Roger L. - 15 Jan 2014 10:48:44 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Michael Sokolov	Thread	Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Piotr Bański
Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Dimitre Novatchev	Date	Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Piotr Bański
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home