Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the wh

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?
From: davep <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 07:28:40 +0000

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:06:49 +0100
Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There is a term denoting the relationship between x and y, x's
> ancestor, or vice versa: x and y are "in the same line of descent."

The two nodes  are co-descendent?
They share a common ancestor? (co-ancestored? Yuk)
They two nodes 'are in the same branch' of the tree?
One is a descendent of the other (is that true for this case?)

regards

-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, (continued) Dimitre Novatchev - 14 Jan 2014 20:34:41 -0000 Michael Sokolov - 14 Jan 2014 22:44:39 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 14 Jan 2014 22:58:25 -0000 Wolfgang Laun - 15 Jan 2014 07:07:03 -0000 davep - 15 Jan 2014 07:28:51 -0000 <= Graydon - 15 Jan 2014 07:44:48 -0000 Michael Kay - 15 Jan 2014 08:28:26 -0000 davep - 15 Jan 2014 09:44:57 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 15 Jan 2014 15:12:54 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Wolfgang Laun	Thread	Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Graydon
Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Wolfgang Laun	Date	Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Graydon
	Month