Subject: Re: [xsl] except (was: Keys with duplicates should be simple) From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 07:18:07 +0000 |
If indeed except is equivalent to the set-theoretic difference operator would it be beyond the pale to admit difference into the syntax as a synonym for except. Is it that different to the situation with || and concat? On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I don't want to have to read the spec to verify that except is in >> fact a set difference operator so I'd just rather not use it. >> > > I'm afraid that when people write code purely by trial and error, there's not much we can do to help them. > > We do try in the language design to avoid surprises, but we don't try to make it possible to write code by guessing the function names and operator symbols. > > Michael Kay > Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] except (was: Keys with du, Ihe Onwuka | Thread | Re: [xsl] except (was: Keys with du, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] except (was: Keys with du, Ihe Onwuka | Date | Re: [xsl] except (was: Keys with du, Michael Kay |
Month |