Subject: Re: [xsl] Verifying large XSL transform output From: Graydon <graydon@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:52:33 -0500 |
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:31:15AM -0500, Matthew Stoeffler scripsit: > On Feb 11, 2014, at 11:15 AM, Graydon wrote: >> Are you trying to tell if the transformation worked to the >> specification (as distinct from producing valid output!), or if you >> didn't lose any text content? > > The issue here is being certain I have all the source content, or at > least all the source content I require. I'd suggest an entirely separate pass that walks through the source content, notes the subtrees in it that you require, and then tries to find the appropriate equivalent in the output. This should be entirely separate from the main transform, so it doesn't pick up any errors; this is the sort of thing where, ideally, someone else should implement it. -- Graydon
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Verifying large XSL trans, Greg Hunt | Thread | Re: [xsl] Verifying large XSL trans, Paul Tyson |
Re: [xsl] Verifying large XSL trans, Tony Graham | Date | Re: [xsl] Verifying large XSL trans, Greg Hunt |
Month |