Subject: Re: [xsl] things about grouping From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:50:22 +0000 |
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ihe, > > (To the list: I'm apparently having trouble with Gmail's new > "features" so please forgive any noisy resends you may see.) > > You wrote: > >> well you are no longer dealing in sets ...... so if you apply a >> set-theoretic construct then all bets are off and the law of the >> jungle applies. > > Substitute "English-language semantics" in for "a set-theoretic > construct" above, and you have a reasonable explanation, I think, for > the "except" business. > > Personally I have a little imp in my head that does a bit of > rewriting, so when I see > > * except head > > I read "child::* except child::head" > <meta property="og:image:width" content="800"/> where the 1st attribute could be anything and the second is always content and I don't want it (it's open graph) I cannot find anything better than data(@* except @content) PAH!!!!
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Ignoring ambiguous matche, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | [xsl] Nested xsl:iterate with inner, Tony Graham |
Re: [xsl] Ignoring ambiguous matche, Ihe Onwuka | Date | Re: [xsl] Ignoring ambiguous matche, Wendell Piez |
Month |