Re: [xsl] XPath 3.0 question: What are function annotations?

Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath 3.0 question: What are function annotations?
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 18:56:58 -0800
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Tony Graham <tgraham@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> My question is: What are function annotations and why they are nowhere
>> defined in the document?
> I also don't know what they are, but they're apparently not meant to be
> there.
> Section J.4.1, Substantive Changes, [1] says function annotations were all
> removed, as does the bug [2] to which the appendix refers.
> I suggest that you add a comment to the bug pointing out what you found.

Thank you, Tony.

So, it appears we need to regard this Proposed Recommendation with a
little grain of ... salt?  Or would it be just little?

Maybe they also missed out something else - important, or mixed other
things, too?

If someone wants to learn XPath 3.0 from this (the only normative)
document, would they be confident they understood the spec correctly?

Really hope there are no other issues of that scale, and obviously,
someone needs to re-read the whole document carefully. A working draft
with such issues is something normal, but a proposed recommendation?

Dimitre Novatchev
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
Never fight an inanimate object
To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
biggest mistake of all
Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep.
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they
write all patents, too? :)
I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.

Current Thread