| 
 
Subject: Re: [xsl] When to use text() From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:38:55 +0000  | 
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >> >> I wouldn't be blaming the programmers for that. >> >> When you step back, it is clear from all the explanations given, that >> the thing doesn't do what it says on the tin. >> > > I think what Ihe is arguing for is that you should be able to read a program without reading its specification and guess correctly what it does. > No. I am arguing against RTFM as a stock response. There are times when it is definitely appropriate, but I don't think this is one of them.
| Current Thread | 
|---|
  | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] When to use text(), Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] When to use text(), Graydon | 
| [xsl] dangling attribute creation (, Andrew Welch | Date | Re: [xsl] dangling attribute creati, Ihe Onwuka | 
| Month |