Subject: Re: [xsl] F & O 3.0 -- serialize() function question From: "Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 19:42:08 -0000 |
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > To me, this means that the result is, in any case, a sequence of > Unicode characters, and not one of octets in any of the possible > (UTF-x) encodings. Aren't utf-8 - encoded characters just "Unicode characters" ? -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the biggest mistake of all ------------------------------------ Quality means doing it right when no one is looking. ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play ------------------------------------- To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep. ------------------------------------- Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. ------------------------------------- Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they write all patents, too? :) ------------------------------------- I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] F & O 3.0 -- serialize() , Wolfgang Laun wolfga | Thread | Re: [xsl] F & O 3.0 -- serialize() , Wolfgang Laun wolfga |
Re: [xsl] F & O 3.0 -- serialize() , Wolfgang Laun wolfga | Date | Re: [xsl] F & O 3.0 -- serialize() , Wolfgang Laun wolfga |
Month |