Subject: Re: [xsl] Schema-awareness and built-in types From: "Max Toro maxtoroq@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:21:07 -0000 |
> A basic XSLT processor can use an XDM implementation that doesn't support type annotations on nodes (other than untyped). This means it can be built on an untyped tree model such as JDOM. OK, so the reason is backwards compatibility with existing XDM implementations. Besides that, assuming this issue didn't exist, would you consider this a good feature? People who care about simple type safety but don't really care about complex type safety could basically forget about XSD and use their own little schema language/function to convert an untyped tree to a type-annotated one, in pure XSLT. -- Max Toro On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > A basic XSLT processor can use an XDM implementation that doesn't support type annotations on nodes (other than untyped). This means it can be built on an untyped tree model such as JDOM. > > Michael Kay > Saxonica > mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx > +44 (0118) 946 5893
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Schema-awareness and buil, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Thread | Re: [xsl] Schema-awareness and buil, Michael Kay mike@xxx |
[xsl] Stream processing a web site , Costello, Roger L. c | Date | Re: [xsl] Schema-awareness and buil, Michael Kay mike@xxx |
Month |