|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Replacing = with == and === From: "Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 15:50:21 -0000 |
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 12:13 AM, BR Chrisman brchrisman@xxxxxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But when it comes down to it, I'd also like an XPath-like-language
> that implicitly lets me parse/address XPath within XSLT attributes
> (like select=) in order to gain further insight into what a particular
> template/routine/etc is doing (and whether I need to modify it via my
> XSLT-transforming-XSLT program.
XQueryX is a *standard* W3C Recommendation:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-xqueryx-30-20140408/
http://www.w3.org/TR/xqueryx/
And at least for the previous version I think there was a Java-based
parser for XQuery, that produced an XQueryX XML document from an
XQuery expression.
Certainly XPath is a true subset of XQuery. This means that the parser
will successfully produce an XQueryX document for any input XPath
expression.
So, one will simply use *XPath* to navigate an XPath expression that
is converted to XQueryX.
I think it wouldn't be too much effort to refactor the XQueryX
grammar, so that a subset of it will be the grammar of what we could
call "XPathX". Maybe an idea for EXPath?
--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Editing XPath expressions, John Lumley john.lum | Thread | Re: [xsl] Replacing = with == and =, L2L 2L emanuelallen@ |
| Re: [xsl] Replacing the element's a, Michael Reed michael | Date | Re: [xsl] Replacing = with == and =, L2L 2L emanuelallen@ |
| Month |