Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Web Components From: "Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:14:15 -0000 |
Well, one that I worked with was ICL QuickBuild, which was used by a few hundred mainframe users in the UK for generating transaction processing applications (some of them massive applications). It actually had many XSLT-like characteristics (which is what attracted me to XSLT when I first encountered it). A program was a declarative description of an entire user session, with all the management of session state taken care of behind the scenes. There were quite a few such languages - most, like this one, tied to particular hardware and software environments. Software AG's NATURAL is another example. I don't think any 4GL had more than about 3% of the market, and that's mainly what killed them - no standards, no critical mass. Michael Kay Saxonica mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx +44 (0) 118 946 5893 On 11 Sep 2014, at 16:55, Ihe Onwuka ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I would like to think that the only thing that will lead to XSLT's decline is when someone invents something better, and there's no sign of that on the horizon. This might be wishful thinking, however; there were some excellent special-purpose languages in the 1980s that didn't survive because they didn't have a viable user and developer community, despite being ideally suited to their task > > Like for example? > > > > XSL-List info and archive > EasyUnsubscribe (by email)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Web Components, Ihe Onwuka ihe.onwuk | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Web Components, Ihe Onwuka ihe.onwuk |
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Web Components, Wendell Piez wapiez@ | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Web Components, Ihe Onwuka ihe.onwuk |
Month |