[xsl] Re: XSLT 3.0: Conflicting information about the possible parents of <xsl:context-item>

Subject: [xsl] Re: XSLT 3.0: Conflicting information about the possible parents of <xsl:context-item>
From: "Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 22:32:30 -0000
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> However, in Section "6.6.1Declaring modes"
>> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-xslt-30-20141002/#declaring-modes)  (as
>> per my previous message), we find this text, referring to an
>> <xsl:mode> declaration:
>>
>> "The above rules apply both to the attributes (other than name) of the
>> xsl:mode element itself, and to the attributes of the contained
>> xsl:context-item element if present."
>>
>
> This paragraph should have been removed from the specification when we removed the possibility to specify xsl:context-item as a child of xsl:mode.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out.

Then the code example in section "2.9 Stylesheets and XML Schemas"
also needs to be removed:

'Example: Asserting the Required Type of the Source Document

<xsl:mode typed="lax">
  <xsl:context-item use="required"
                    as="document-node(schema-element(my:invoice))"/>
</xsl:mode>'


>
> Michael Kay
> Saxonica
>



-- 
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
biggest mistake of all
------------------------------------
Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
-------------------------------------
To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep.
-------------------------------------
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
-------------------------------------
Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they
write all patents, too? :)
-------------------------------------
I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.

Current Thread