Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: XSLT 3.0: The definition of the "unnamed mode" From: "Alan Painter alan.painter@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 09:51:01 -0000 |
+1 ;) On Jan 4, 2015 8:34 AM, "Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx" < xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 3 January 2015 at 21:11, Alan Painter alan.painter@xxxxxxxxx < > xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Perhaps we could refer to the "unnamed mode" as "the mode that must not >> be named". >> > > Or simply "Voldemode"? ;-) > > -W > > On Jan 2, 2015 11:27 PM, "Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx" < >> xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> >>> > "There is a mode, called the unnamed mode, that has no name. The >>> properties of the unnamed mode may be defined using an xsl:mode declaration >>> with an absent name attribute. The unnamed mode is the default mode for an >>> xsl:apply-templates or xsl:template element with no mode attribute, unless >>> a different mode is nominated as the default using an [xsl:]default-mode >>> attribute." >>> >>> XSL-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list> > EasyUnsubscribe <-list/552232> (by > email <>)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: XSLT 3.0: The definit, Wolfgang Laun wolfga | Thread | [xsl] Re: XSLT 3.0: Conflicting inf, Michael Kay mike@xxx |
Re: [xsl] Re: XSLT 3.0: The definit, Wolfgang Laun wolfga | Date | [xsl] Saxon.js on the server?, O'Neil Delpratt onei |
Month |