Re: [xsl] XPath expression to check that there are no intervening elements?

Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath expression to check that there are no intervening elements?
From: "G. Ken Holman g.ken.holman@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 16:16:28 -0000
I like Mike's answer for XSLT 2.

Your XSLT 1 solution can be improved by reducing the number of counting actions. Your solution has three uses of count() ... this has only two:

  count(B[last()]/preceding-sibling::*[not(self::B)]) =
  count(B[1]/preceding-sibling::*[not(self::B)])

Avoiding the use of counting you could do the following:

  string( generate-id( B[1]/preceding-sibling::*[not(self::B)][1] ) ) =
  string( generate-id( B[last()]/preceding-sibling::*[not(self::B)][1] ) )

The use of string() is necessary in case the sequence of children starts with B.

Come to think of it, neither your answer, Mike's answer nor my answer will work if there are no B children at all. You will get a false positive. Does your test need to accommodate that situation?

. . . . . . . . Ken

At 2016-07-19 15:44 +0000, Costello, Roger L. costello@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Folks,

This XML has a solid block of <B> elements:

<Document>
    <A/>
    <B/>
    <B/>
</Document>

This XML has an intervening <C> element:

<Document>
    <A/>
    <B/>
    <C/>
    <B/>
</Document>

I need an XPath expression to return a Boolean value:

        Return true if there is one solid block of <B> elements
                (no intervening elements).
        Otherwise, return false.

I created a horrendous XPath expression to solve it:

count(B) eq (B[last()]/count(preceding-sibling::*)+1 - B[1]/count(preceding-sibling::*))

Can you provide a better (simpler, more efficient) XPath expression?

/Roger



--
Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources |
Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training @US$45: http://goo.gl/Dd9qBK |
Crane Softwrights Ltd. _ _ _ _ _ _ http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ |
G Ken Holman _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Google+ blog _ _ _ _ _ http://plus.google.com/+GKenHolman-Crane/posts |
Legal business disclaimers: _ _ http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal |


--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Current Thread