Re: [xsl] XSLT 2: Best Way to Synthesize Elements Given List of Tagnames

["Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Eliot Kimber ekimber@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That's very clever. I'm not sure it's clearer than my current recursive
> solution though :-)

Why, this is non-recursive, 10-lines transformation that contains just
two XPath expressions, not counting the tokenization -- the template
match pattern and the indexing of the tokens to get the current
element-to-construct name.

Also, as an added benefit, one could experiment with the used XML
document's depth, to reveal what the limits of their XSLT
processor/XML-parser are :)


Cheers,
Dimitre



>
> Cheers,
>
> E.
> --
> Eliot Kimber
> http://contrext.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11/5/16, 11:49 AM, "Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx"
> <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>I'd suggest this non-recursive solution:
>>
>><xsl:stylesheet version="2.0"
>>xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";>
>> <xsl:output omit-xml-declaration="yes" indent="yes"/>
>>
>> <xsl:param name="pPath" select="'/foo/bar/baz/bam/bak/bap/bah/baw'"/>
>>
>> <xsl:variable name="vNames" select="tokenize($pPath, '/')[.]"/>
>>
>>  <xsl:template match="*[count(current()/ancestor::*) lt count($vNames)]">
>>    <xsl:element name="{$vNames[count(current()/ancestor::node())]}">
>>      <xsl:apply-templates select="*"/>
>>    </xsl:element>
>>  </xsl:template>
>>
>>  <xsl:template match="text()"/>
>></xsl:stylesheet>
>>
>>
>>When applied on:
>>
>><x1>
>> <x2>
>>  <x3>
>>   <x4>
>>    <x5>
>>     <x6>
>>      <x7>
>>       <x8>
>>        <x9>
>>         <x10>
>>          <x11>
>>           <x12>
>>            <x13>
>>             <x14>
>>              <x15>
>>               <x16>
>>                <x17>
>>                 <x18>
>>                  <x19>
>>                   <x20>
>>                   </x20>
>>                  </x19>
>>                 </x18>
>>                </x17>
>>               </x16>
>>              </x15>
>>             </x14>
>>            </x13>
>>           </x12>
>>          </x11>
>>         </x10>
>>        </x9>
>>       </x8>
>>      </x7>
>>     </x6>
>>    </x5>
>>   </x4>
>>  </x3>
>> </x2>
>></x1>
>>
>>the result is:
>>
>><foo>
>>   <bar>
>>      <baz>
>>         <bam>
>>            <bak>
>>               <bap>
>>                  <bah>
>>                     <baw/>
>>                  </bah>
>>               </bap>
>>            </bak>
>>         </bam>
>>      </baz>
>>   </bar>
>></foo>
>>
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Dimitre
>>
>>On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Eliot Kimber ekimber@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>><xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Say I have this string: "foo/bar" (or any arbitrarily-long sequence of
>>> /-delimited tag names) and want to construct from it:
>>>
>>> <foo>
>>>   <bar>
>>>     <!-- Stuff added here that I get from somewhere else -->
>>>   </bar>
>>> </foo>
>>>
>>> Is there an easier or more obvious way to generate this than an
>>>recursive
>>> function?
>>>
>>> With a recursive function I can easily create child elements until the
>>> sequence is exhausted but it feels like there should be an easier way
>>> using XSLT 2 but if there is I'm not thinking of it.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Eliot
>>>
>>> --
>>> Eliot Kimber
>>> http://contrext.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Cheers,
>>Dimitre Novatchev
>>---------------------------------------
>>Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
>>---------------------------------------
>>To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
>>-------------------------------------
>>Never fight an inanimate object
>>-------------------------------------
>>To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
>>biggest mistake of all
>>------------------------------------
>>Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
>>-------------------------------------
>>You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
>>you're doing is work or play
>>-------------------------------------
>>To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep.
>>-------------------------------------
>>Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
>>-------------------------------------
>>Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they
>>write all patents, too? :)
>>-------------------------------------
>>Sanity is madness put to good use.
>>-------------------------------------
>>I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.
>>
>>
> 



-- 
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
biggest mistake of all
------------------------------------
Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
-------------------------------------
To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep.
-------------------------------------
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
-------------------------------------
Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they
write all patents, too? :)
-------------------------------------
Sanity is madness put to good use.
-------------------------------------
I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.