Subject: Re: [xsl] In XSLT 3.0, should the "document" function be available in xsl:evaluate? From: "Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 19:04:03 -0000 |
Looks pretty clear it's a bug. I also spotted recently that Saxon's xsl:evaluate allows you to call stylesheet functions that are (explicitly or implicitly) private. We'll only catch these things if people notice them and report them. Michael Kay Saxonica > On 16 Jan 2017, at 15:04, Martin Honnen martin.honnen@xxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 16.01.2017 15:55, Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> Have you also tried the XPath function doc() ? > > Yes, using 'doc' instead of 'document' all three implementations return the same result, namely two times the stylesheet code. But I am not so much looking for a solution to get some code working but I am rather trying to understand why Saxon or XMLSpy make 'document' available in xsl:evaluate, given that the spec seems to exclude XSLT only functions.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] In XSLT 3.0, should the ", Martin Honnen martin | Thread | Re: [xsl] In XSLT 3.0, should the ", Michael Kay mike@xxx |
Re: [xsl] In XSLT 3.0, should the ", Martin Honnen martin | Date | Re: [xsl] In XSLT 3.0, should the ", Michael Kay mike@xxx |
Month |