Subject: Re: [xsl] Find First Descendants That Match Predicate? From: "Eliot Kimber ekimber@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 17:33:33 -0000 |
It's the reverse logic: exclude those that have an ancestor titled thing that is itself a descendant of the current node. Cheers, E. -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com o;?On 12/27/18, 11:16 AM, "Peter Flynn peter@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: On 27/12/2018 15:15, Eliot Kimber ekimber@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > That seems too easy ( [...] > o;?On 12/25/18, 12:42 PM, "Wendell Piez wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > How about > > .//*[title] except .//*[title]//*[title] Shouldn't that be .//*[title] except .//*[title]/*[title] to exclude those with immediate children with a title, rather than excluding those which have any-depth descendants with a title? P
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Find First Descendants Th, Peter Flynn peter@xx | Thread | Re: [xsl] Find First Descendants Th, Wendell Piez wapiez@ |
Re: [xsl] Find First Descendants Th, Peter Flynn peter@xx | Date | Re: [xsl] Find First Descendants Th, Wendell Piez wapiez@ |
Month |