Subject: Re: [xsl] Adding entity declarations to DOCTYPE in xml output From: "Wendell Piez wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 21:43:42 -0000 |
Hey Liam, On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 12:12 AM Liam R. E. Quin liam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If XML had (like HTML) been without an inclusion mechanism of its own, > solutions like XInclude woudlwould have happened sooner. The barely > adequate discourages the excellent. Too true. There are tradeoffs even to the tradeoffs. > A problem with entities is that they are in the syntactic domain rather > than representing relationships. Indeed indeed. They stand between us and the parse. Yet I find the same thing to be true of all these so-called static site generators, which work entirely by tag-patching, and think we have still not come far enough. The bad old thing keeps getting reinvented even after we have better. It makes me sad to have beautiful clean data coming out of my process and hear them say, do you think we could have it in Markdown? Cheers, Wendell
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Adding entity declaration, Liam R. E. Quin liam | Thread | Re: [xsl] Adding entity declaration, Eliot Kimber ekimber |
Re: [xsl] XSLT 3.0 schema awareness, Mukul Gandhi gandhi. | Date | Re: [xsl] Adding entity declaration, Eliot Kimber ekimber |
Month |