|
Subject: [xsl] Finding Only Initial Following Siblings That Meet Some Criteria From: "Eliot Kimber ekimber@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 22:29:05 -0000 |
In my XML I can have adjacent elements that should be processed as a unit, where the adjacent elements all have the same value for a given attribute. Other elements with the same attribute could be following siblings but separated by other elements or text nodes, i.e.:
<p>Text <ph outputclass="x">1</ph><ph outputclass="x">2</ph> more text <ph outputclass="x">New sequence</ph></p>
Where the rendered result should combine the first two <ph> elements but not the third, i.e.:
<p>Text <x>12</x> more text <x>New sequence</x></p>
Processing is applied to the first element in the document with the @outputclass value "x" and then I want to grab any immediately following siblings with the same @outputclass value and no intervening text or element nodes.
My solution is to use for-each-group like so:
<xsl:variable name="this" as="element()" select="."/>
<xsl:variable name="adjacent-sibs" as="element()+">
<xsl:for-each-group select="($this, $this/following-sibling::node())"
group-adjacent="string(@outputclass)">
<xsl:if test=". is $this">
<xsl:sequence select="current-group()"/>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:for-each-group>
</xsl:variable>
Which works, but I'm thinking there must be a more compact way to do the same selection, but the formulation is escaping me.
Is there a more compact or more efficient way to make this selection of only immediately-adjacent following siblings?
Thanks,
E.
--
Eliot Kimber
http://contrext.com
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] xsl:mode and priorities q, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Thread | Re: [xsl] Finding Only Initial Foll, Imsieke, Gerrit, le- |
| Re: [xsl] Tree Comparing Algorithm, Martin Honnen martin | Date | Re: [xsl] Finding Only Initial Foll, Imsieke, Gerrit, le- |
| Month |