## Re: [xsl] Is this the best way to compute a sigmoid function?

 Subject: Re: [xsl] Is this the best way to compute a sigmoid function? From: "Martin Honnen martin.honnen@xxxxxx" Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 18:00:52 -0000
On 02.05.2020 19:55, Costello, Roger L. costello@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Folks,

I have a variable \$x that has a value such as 0.6

I want to compute the result of evaluating this sigmoid function:

```      1
----------------
(1 + e**-x)```

That is, compute 1 divided by (1 + e raised to the -x power)
```Does your environment not support
https://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/#func-math-exp?```

I am using the exp template in Dimitre's FXSL library.

[Dimitre, incredible library]

I created a wrapper function that simply calls Dimitre's exp template:

```<xsl:function name="f:e" as="xs:decimal">
<xsl:param name="x" as="xs:decimal" />```

```     <xsl:call-template name="exp">
<xsl:with-param name="pX" select="\$x" />
</xsl:call-template>
</xsl:function>```

Then I computed the sigmoid function this way:

<xsl:variable name="e-to-the-minus-x-power" select="f:e(-\$x)"
as="xs:decimal" />
<xsl:value-of select="1 div (1 + \$e-to-the-minus-x-power)"/>

When \$x has the value 0.6 I get this result: 0.645656306189717285

Do you see any errors in how I am computing the sigmoid function?

Is there a better way to do it? That is, one that returns more accurate
```results? (However, it already appears to be mighty accurate -- look at all
those digits to the right of the decimal point) Notice that for the variable
\$e-to-the-minus-x-power I specified it this way: as="xs:decimal". Should I
have specified it this way: as="xs:float" instead? Would that yield
better/more-accurate/more-reliable/more-whatever results?
```

Any suggestions you might have would be greatly appreciated.

/Roger