Subject: Re: [xsl] Find the next item in a sequence From: "Liam R. E. Quin liam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 00:12:26 -0000 |
On Sun, 2020-05-03 at 20:00 +0000, David Carlisle d.p.carlisle@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > position()+1 directly. Why can't I use position()+1 directly? > > [...] with a numeric value is short for [position()=...] so [ > position()+1] is short for [position()=position()+1] which is not an > error > but is always false. In particular, $sock[12] looks like an array index in many other languages, but isn't. Watching the mistakes people make, and understanding them, really gives good understanding at times :) -- Liam Quin, https://www.delightfulcomputing.com/ Available for XML/Document/Information Architecture/XSLT/ XSL/XQuery/Web/Text Processing/A11Y training, work & consulting. Barefoot Web-slave, antique illustrations: http://www.fromoldbooks.org
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Find the next item in a s, David Carlisle d.p.c | Thread | [xsl] What is the default global co, Erik Siegel erik@xxx |
Re: [xsl] Find the next item in a s, David Carlisle d.p.c | Date | [xsl] What is the default global co, Erik Siegel erik@xxx |
Month |