Subject: Re: [xsl] Tool that measures the performance of an XSLT program ata fine granularity? From: "Liam R. E. Quin liam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 21:30:04 -0000 |
On Sun, 2020-07-26 at 21:00 +0000, Dr. Roger L Costello costello@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Thanks Michael. If there is no way to get the performance of the > basic pieces of an XSLT program, then how does one determine what is > causing an XSLT program to run slow? For example, I have a function f > that calls functions A, B, and C. The SAXON profile tool says that > the total execution time for A, B, and C is 1 ms. The profile tool > says that total time for f is 6 minutes. Without fine-grain > profiling, I see no way to determine what is causing f to take so > long to execute. Suggestions? You need to look at what f calls in turn. If possible, try simplifying the expression in question, even if it gives wrong answers - e.g. remove the call to pow() or the multiplication. If $length is large, random-sequence() may be slow, too. -- Liam Quin, https://www.delightfulcomputing.com/ Available for XML/Document/Information Architecture/XSLT/ XSL/XQuery/Web/Text Processing/A11Y training, work & consulting. Barefoot Web-slave, antique illustrations: http://www.fromoldbooks.org
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Tool that measures the pe, Dr. Roger L Costello | Thread | [xsl] case conversion with replace(, Wolfhart Totschnig w |
Re: [xsl] Tool that measures the pe, Dr. Roger L Costello | Date | [xsl] case conversion with replace(, Wolfhart Totschnig w |
Month |