Subject: Re: [xsl] Are xsl:accumulator-rules exclusive ? From: "Christophe Marchand cmarchand@xxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:30:49 -0000 |
Thanks a lot, Michael. Best regards, Christophe Le 22/09/2020 C 00:01, Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx a C)critB : > B'18.2.3: B If there is more than one matching rule, the last in > document order is used. If there is no matching rule, the value of the > accumulator variable does not change. > > Michael Kay > Saxonica > >> On 21 Sep 2020, at 22:52, Christophe Marchand cmarchand@xxxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:cmarchand@xxxxxxxxxx> >> <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I didn't manage to find the response in the specs, so... >> >> Are xsl:accumulator-rule mutually exclusives, and do default >> priorities for template rules apply in accumulator-rule ? Is the same >> node able to fire many xsl:accumulator-rule in the same mode, if >> evaluated only once ? >> >> For example, if I have this accumulator : >> >> B <xsl:accumulator name="weight" as="xs:integer" initial-value="0"> >> B B B <xsl:accumulator-rule match="box[xs:integer(@width) gt >> 100][xs:integer(@height) gt 100]" select="$value + 100"/> >> B B B <xsl:accumulator-rule match="box[xs:integer(@width) gt >> 50][xs:integer(@height) gt 50]" select="$value + 50"/> >> B B B <xsl:accumulator-rule match="box" select="$value + 1"/> >> B </xsl:accumulator> >> B <xsl:mode use-accumulators="#all" on-no-match="shallow-copy"/> >> >> B <xsl:template name="xsl:initial-template"> >> B B B <xsl:variable name="content" as="element(box)*"> >> B B B B B <box width="150" height="150"/> >> B B B </xsl:variable> >> B B B <xsl:apply-templates select="$content"/> >> B </xsl:template> >> >> >> I'd expect to get <box width="150" height="150">100</box> but I get >> <box width="150" height="150">1</box>. >> >> Is it normal ? >> >> Should I put a xsl:choose in the rule match="box" and evaluate all >> possibilities inside the choose ? >> >> Best regards, >> Christophe >> > > XSL-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list> > EasyUnsubscribe <http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/2837134> > (by email <>)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Are xsl:accumulator-rules, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Thread | [xsl] Converting XML into ODT docum, Manuel Souto Pico te |
Re: [xsl] Are xsl:accumulator-rules, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Date | [xsl] Converting XML into ODT docum, Manuel Souto Pico te |
Month |