Subject: Re: [xsl] xpath versions comparison From: "Liam R. E. Quin liam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 07:44:48 -0000 |
On Sat, 2021-01-02 at 06:01 +0000, Mukul Gandhi mukulg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi all, > B B B As we all know, currently we've following versions of XPath > language: > 1.0, 2.0 & 3.1. > > I've been trying to think that, what are the major differences > between the > above mentioned XPath versions. Below are my thoughts, > > 1) XPath 2.0 has introduced sequences, right, and the nodes are now typed. > Now we can see, XPath 4.0 spec being developed by W3C, 4.0 is not being developed "by the W3C" but in a community group wih a mailing list and wiki hosted by W3C. There is no longer a W3C XSLT Working Group. There are many more differences between the versions; each spec has a Changes section, and Mike Kay's XSLT 2 book highlights some less obvious changes. But you have found many of the main changes i think. Liam -- Liam Quin,B https://www.delightfulcomputing.com/ Available for XML/Document/Information Architecture/XSLT/ XSL/XQuery/Web/Text Processing/A11Y training, work & consulting. Barefoot Web-slave, antique illustrations: B http://www.fromoldbooks.org
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] xpath versions comparison, Mukul Gandhi mukulg@ | Thread | Re: [xsl] xpath versions comparison, Mukul Gandhi mukulg@ |
[xsl] xpath versions comparison, Mukul Gandhi mukulg@ | Date | Re: [xsl] xpath versions comparison, Mukul Gandhi mukulg@ |
Month |