Subject: [xsl] is xslt "canonicalizable" can it be canonicalized? From: "BR Chrisman brchrisman@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 01:37:39 -0000 |
One example, inside a template: <foo bar="baz"/> and <xsl:element name="foo"> <xsl:attribute name="bar">baz</xsl:attribute> </xsl:element> are equivalent (*). (*) I might be missing something here in the example... possible, but my point isn't about whether this example is identically equivalent./. just about whether there's been an effort to provide a canonicalization transform. My motivation here is to be able to pre-process templates while not having to canonicalize the xslt myself in order to make sure.. for example, that I'm not going to have to handle those two (or many more) methods of doing the same thing with separate template matches in the pre-processor templates. Hopefully this question makes sense. Sincerely, Brian
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: What is the Venn diag, Martin Honnen martin | Thread | Re: [xsl] is xslt "canonicalizable", Liam R. E. Quin liam |
Re: [xsl] What is the Venn diagram , Piez, Wendell A. (Fe | Date | Re: [xsl] is xslt "canonicalizable", Liam R. E. Quin liam |
Month |